Skip to content

Retrievability and UX · Branch R.B, Information architecture and retrievability

R-06 Tables must be used only for genuinely structured data

P1OfficialStrong practicePartly automated

Comparison and fact tables must make shared criteria, units and, where needed, source and date clear. They must not become a keyword stuffing format.

Scope
All public content
Priority
High priority.
Quality bucket
Retrievability and UX
Legacy coverage
GEO-14

Why it matters

A table without clear criteria or units forces readers to guess what each number means. Search engines and AI answer engines read tables as structured facts, so a table that is really a keyword list gives them nothing reliable to use.

How to implement

  1. Decide which criteria every row shares and make them the columns.
  2. State units in the column header or beside each value.
  3. Add a source and date where the figures need them.
  4. Test the table on a mobile screen and fix any layout problems.
  5. Turn any keyword list posing as a table back into normal text.

Checklist

  • Put shared criteria in the columns.
  • Explain units in the header or with each value.
  • Add source and date to the table when needed.
  • Keep it accessible on mobile.
  • Do not present a keyword list as a table.

How to audit

  • Check that the table headers and cells still make sense when exported.

How UltimateSEO checks this automatically

Partly automated. A review of tables on key templates to confirm they hold real structured data rather than layout or filler. The crawl gives a signal; a person decides the final state with business evidence.

States used: PASS, FAIL, UNKNOWN, NOT_APPLICABLE or BLOCKED. UNKNOWN is never shown as a pass. How states work.

Sources

Part of The UltimateSEO Framework v4.1, revised 2026-10-07. Evidence states, control states and the publish gate are explained on the hub.

Check this control on your own site

The instant scan maps what it finds to this control and tells you honestly whether it could verify it.